Cravath’s New York Office Moves to Two Manhattan West
Marc J. Khadpe focuses on intellectual property litigation.
A representative list of Mr. Khadpe’s matters includes:
- Blue Yonder Group Inc. v. Kinaxis Inc.: Representing Blue Yonder in a patent infringement action relating to supply chain management technology.
- In the Matter of Illumina, Inc. and Grail, Inc.: Represented Illumina in an administrative challenge brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning Illumina’s $8 billion acquisition of GRAIL. In September 2022, the FTC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Illumina and rejected the FTC’s challenge to the merger.
- Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to remote monitoring and control of equipment.
- In re Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof: Represented Qualcomm in International Trade Commission investigation relating to mobile device technology.
- iControl Networks, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in patent infringement actions relating to home automation and security systems.
- Exelis Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al.: Represented Qualcomm in patent infringement litigation relating to mobile device positioning technology.
- Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. et al.: Represented IBM in class action litigation alleging violations of the law of nations under the Alien Tort Statute.
- In re Vehicle Tracking and Security System (‘844) Patent Litigation: Represented Qualcomm and its customers in multi‑district patent litigation concerning commercial fleet tracking and monitoring technology.
- Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation: Represented IBM in dispute over mainframe software involving licensing, business torts, antitrust, and copyright claims.
- Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Represented Qualcomm in patent litigation related to mobile device communication technology.
Mr. Khadpe was born in Plantation, Florida. He received a B.S. from Pennsylvania State University in 1999, a Masters in Human‑Computer Interaction from Carnegie Mellon University in 2000 and a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2006. Mr. Khadpe joined Cravath in 2006. In 2014, he left the Firm to pursue a software development project. He rejoined the Firm in 2016 and was elected senior attorney in 2022. Mr. Khadpe is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
A representative list of Mr. Khadpe’s matters includes:
- Blue Yonder Group Inc. v. Kinaxis Inc.: Representing Blue Yonder in a patent infringement action relating to supply chain management technology.
- In the Matter of Illumina, Inc. and Grail, Inc.: Represented Illumina in an administrative challenge brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning Illumina’s $8 billion acquisition of GRAIL. In September 2022, the FTC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Illumina and rejected the FTC’s challenge to the merger.
- Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to remote monitoring and control of equipment.
- In re Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof: Represented Qualcomm in International Trade Commission investigation relating to mobile device technology.
- iControl Networks, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in patent infringement actions relating to home automation and security systems.
- Exelis Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al.: Represented Qualcomm in patent infringement litigation relating to mobile device positioning technology.
- Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. et al.: Represented IBM in class action litigation alleging violations of the law of nations under the Alien Tort Statute.
- In re Vehicle Tracking and Security System (‘844) Patent Litigation: Represented Qualcomm and its customers in multi‑district patent litigation concerning commercial fleet tracking and monitoring technology.
- Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation: Represented IBM in dispute over mainframe software involving licensing, business torts, antitrust, and copyright claims.
- Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Represented Qualcomm in patent litigation related to mobile device communication technology.
Mr. Khadpe was born in Plantation, Florida. He received a B.S. from Pennsylvania State University in 1999, a Masters in Human‑Computer Interaction from Carnegie Mellon University in 2000 and a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2006. Mr. Khadpe joined Cravath in 2006. In 2014, he left the Firm to pursue a software development project. He rejoined the Firm in 2016 and was elected senior attorney in 2022. Mr. Khadpe is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Education
-
J.D., 2006, University of Pennsylvania Law Schoolcum laude
-
M.HCI, 2000, Carnegie Mellon University
-
B.S., 1999, Pennsylvania State University
Admitted In
- New York
Professional Affiliations
New York City Bar Association
Deals & Cases
October 17, 2024
ADT Wins Appeal Affirming PTAB Decision Invalidating Patent Claims
On October 15, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed an inter partes review (“IPR”) decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) in favor of Cravath client ADT Inc., invalidating all claims of a patent at issue in litigation brought by Vivint, Inc.
Marc J. Khadpe focuses on intellectual property litigation.
A representative list of Mr. Khadpe’s matters includes:
- Blue Yonder Group Inc. v. Kinaxis Inc.: Representing Blue Yonder in a patent infringement action relating to supply chain management technology.
- In the Matter of Illumina, Inc. and Grail, Inc.: Represented Illumina in an administrative challenge brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning Illumina’s $8 billion acquisition of GRAIL. In September 2022, the FTC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Illumina and rejected the FTC’s challenge to the merger.
- Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to remote monitoring and control of equipment.
- In re Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof: Represented Qualcomm in International Trade Commission investigation relating to mobile device technology.
- iControl Networks, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in patent infringement actions relating to home automation and security systems.
- Exelis Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al.: Represented Qualcomm in patent infringement litigation relating to mobile device positioning technology.
- Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. et al.: Represented IBM in class action litigation alleging violations of the law of nations under the Alien Tort Statute.
- In re Vehicle Tracking and Security System (‘844) Patent Litigation: Represented Qualcomm and its customers in multi‑district patent litigation concerning commercial fleet tracking and monitoring technology.
- Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation: Represented IBM in dispute over mainframe software involving licensing, business torts, antitrust, and copyright claims.
- Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Represented Qualcomm in patent litigation related to mobile device communication technology.
Mr. Khadpe was born in Plantation, Florida. He received a B.S. from Pennsylvania State University in 1999, a Masters in Human‑Computer Interaction from Carnegie Mellon University in 2000 and a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2006. Mr. Khadpe joined Cravath in 2006. In 2014, he left the Firm to pursue a software development project. He rejoined the Firm in 2016 and was elected senior attorney in 2022. Mr. Khadpe is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
A representative list of Mr. Khadpe’s matters includes:
- Blue Yonder Group Inc. v. Kinaxis Inc.: Representing Blue Yonder in a patent infringement action relating to supply chain management technology.
- In the Matter of Illumina, Inc. and Grail, Inc.: Represented Illumina in an administrative challenge brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) concerning Illumina’s $8 billion acquisition of GRAIL. In September 2022, the FTC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Illumina and rejected the FTC’s challenge to the merger.
- Vivint, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in a patent infringement action relating to remote monitoring and control of equipment.
- In re Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof: Represented Qualcomm in International Trade Commission investigation relating to mobile device technology.
- iControl Networks, Inc. v. Alarm.com Inc.: Represented Alarm.com in patent infringement actions relating to home automation and security systems.
- Exelis Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al.: Represented Qualcomm in patent infringement litigation relating to mobile device positioning technology.
- Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. et al.: Represented IBM in class action litigation alleging violations of the law of nations under the Alien Tort Statute.
- In re Vehicle Tracking and Security System (‘844) Patent Litigation: Represented Qualcomm and its customers in multi‑district patent litigation concerning commercial fleet tracking and monitoring technology.
- Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation: Represented IBM in dispute over mainframe software involving licensing, business torts, antitrust, and copyright claims.
- Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated: Represented Qualcomm in patent litigation related to mobile device communication technology.
Mr. Khadpe was born in Plantation, Florida. He received a B.S. from Pennsylvania State University in 1999, a Masters in Human‑Computer Interaction from Carnegie Mellon University in 2000 and a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2006. Mr. Khadpe joined Cravath in 2006. In 2014, he left the Firm to pursue a software development project. He rejoined the Firm in 2016 and was elected senior attorney in 2022. Mr. Khadpe is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Southern District of New York and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Education
-
J.D., 2006, University of Pennsylvania Law Schoolcum laude
-
M.HCI, 2000, Carnegie Mellon University
-
B.S., 1999, Pennsylvania State University
Admitted In
- New York
Professional Affiliations
New York City Bar Association
Deals & Cases
October 17, 2024
ADT Wins Appeal Affirming PTAB Decision Invalidating Patent Claims
On October 15, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed an inter partes review (“IPR”) decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) in favor of Cravath client ADT Inc., invalidating all claims of a patent at issue in litigation brought by Vivint, Inc.
Cravath Bicentennial
Celebrating 200 years of partnership. In 2019, we celebrated our bicentennial. Our history mirrors that of our nation. Integral to our story is our culture.
Attorney Advertising. ©2024 Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.